Numbers and Words
- 1 October 1985
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 9 (5) , 627-643
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8500900505
Abstract
This article discusses how quantitative and qualitative methods can be combined in a single evaluation study to better understand the phenomenon in question. Three perspectives on combining methods are reviewed: the purist approach where the two methods are seen as mutually exclusive, the situationalist approach that views them as separate but equal, and the pragmatist approach that suggests integration is possible. From the pragmatist position it is argued that either method can be used at the analysis stage to corroborate (provide convergence in findings), elaborate (provide richness and detail), or initiate (offer new interpretations) findings from the other method. Specific examples of how results from each method can inform the other are offered.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Debate about Quantitative and Qualitative Research: A Question of Method or Epistemology?British Journal of Sociology, 1984
- Statistics versus WordsSociological Theory, 1984
- Learning the Craft of Organizational ResearchAcademy of Management Review, 1983
- Quantitative Versus Qualitative Research: An Attempt to Clarify the IssueEducational Researcher, 1983
- Assistance and EnforcementKnowledge, 1983
- Some Benefits of Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Program Evaluation, with IllustrationsEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1982
- Merging Quantitative and Qualitative Research Techniques: Toward a New Research Paradigm1Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 1981
- Disciplines of Inquiry in Education: An OverviewEducational Researcher, 1981
- ON THE RELATIONS AMONG EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH PARADIGMS: FROM DISDAIN TO DETENTE2Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 1977
- Some Methodological Problems of Field StudiesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1962