Re-examining threats to the reliability and validity of putative brain-behavior relationships: New guidelines for assessing the effect of patients lost to follow-up
- 1 June 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
- Vol. 16 (3) , 339-343
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639408402644
Abstract
It often happens in behavioral and biomedical research that subjects in prospective, multiple assessment investigations, including clinical trials, are lost to follow-up evaluations. The purpose of this report is to outline a model that will enable the investigators to determine the extent to which results based upon the maintained cohort can be generalized to the attrited cohort, or those subjects lost to follow-up. While our proposed model derives from a specific application pertaining to changes in personality and affect behaviors following left and right hemisphere stroke, it should apply, with appropriate study-specific modifications, to a wide range of follow-up research designs in neuropsychology, behavioral science more generally, and other areas of biomedical research.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emotional sequelae of stroke.Neuropsychology, 1993
- Development and validation of the Neuropsychology Behavior and Affect Profile.Psychological Assessment, 1989
- The Meaning of Content ValidityApplied Psychological Measurement, 1983
- Clinical biostatisticsClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1977
- “Mini-mental state”Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1975
- Error rates for multiple comparison methods: Some evidence concerning the frequency of erroneous conclusions.Psychological Bulletin, 1969
- PRESENCE AND LATERALITY OF BRAIN DAMAGE PREDICTED FROM RESPONSES TO A SHORT APHASIA SCREENING TESTPublished by SAGE Publications ,1962