Dental Effects of Community Waters Accidentally Fluorinated for Nineteen Years: II. Differences in the Extent of Caries Reduction among the Different Types of Permanent Teeth
- 1 January 1948
- journal article
- research article
- Published by JSTOR in Public Health Reports®
- Vol. 63 (18) , 563-573
- https://doi.org/10.2307/4586534
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that children born and reared in a New Jersey area in which the drinking water contains 1.3 to 2.2 ppm. of natural fluoride are less subject to dental caries than children who have entered this area later in life, but there is also a familial factor involved. Examinations have been made to determine whether or not all teeth were protected to an equal extent. 874 life time residents and 725 migrants were compared with 6,000 children in Hagers-town, Md., where the water contains no fluoride. The teeth posterior in the mouth were less protected than those anterior. .Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Certain Drinking Waters Favor Dental Caries?Science, 1947
- The Family and Dental Disease: V. Caries Experience among Parents and Offspring Exposed to Drinking Water Containing FluoridePublic Health Reports (1896-1970), 1947
- The Family and Dental Disease. IV: Dental Disease (DMF) Experience in Parents and Offspring**The preceding papers in this series “The Family and Dental Disease” are: I. DMF Experience Among Husbands and Wives. J.A.D.A. 32:945, August 1, 1945; II. Age of Parents and Dental Caries (DMF) Experience in Offspring (in preparation); III. Size of Family and Dental Caries (DMF) Experience in Offspring (in preparation).The Journal of the American Dental Association, 1946
- Medical Evaluation of Nutritional Status. Part X. Susceptibility to Dental Caries and Family IncomeThe Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 1942