Detailed per-oral small bowel examination vs. enteroclysis. Part I: Expenditures and radiation exposure.
- 1 April 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 155 (1) , 29-31
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.155.1.3975413
Abstract
Time involved, patient reaction, and radiation exposure were compared for 25 patients undergoing a per-oral small bowel series and 18 having enteroclysis. For the per-oral study, mean room time was 17 minutes and fluoroscopy time was 4 minutes; for enteroclysis, mean room time was 44 minutes and fluoroscopy time was 22 minutes. Side effects were categorized as mild to moderate in two thirds of patients having enteroclysis, whereas they were minimal in 20% of those having the per-oral examination. Radiation exposure was five times greater for enteroclysis. These factors should be considered along with the age of the patient, indications for the examination, and the accuracy of the technique when planning a study of the small bowel.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Small bowel double-contrast enema in stage III ovarian cancerAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1984
- Crohn's disease of the small intestine: A review of the radiological appearances in 100 consecutive patients examined by a barium infusion techniqueClinical Radiology, 1980
- An evaluation of the small bowel enema based on an analysis of 350 consecutive examinationsClinical Radiology, 1980
- Radiographic findings of the National Cooperative Crohn's Disease StudyGastroenterology, 1979