REINFORCEMENT AND SUBSTITUTION IN HUMANS: A MULTIPLE RESPONSE ANALYSIS1
- 1 November 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 30 (3) , 243-253
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1978.30-243
Abstract
Three adult human subjects engaged in activities such as reading, sewing, artwork, and candlemaking while living alone in a laboratory apartment 24 hours per day for several weeks. After a baseline period in which the activities were fully available, access to a particular activity (contingent response) was made dependent on engaging in another less-preferred activity (instrumental response). The contingencies produced substantial increases in instrumental responding, and responding decreased toward baseline levels when the dependency was removed. Under the contingent conditions, time earned for the concurrent activity was always less than the baseline level. To determine the contribution of this reduction to the instrumental increase, access to the contingent activity was restricted in the absence of any dependency. The results indicated that increases among responses that filled the newly available time could be selective, e.g., artwork increased when reading was restricted but candlemaking did not. It was concluded that the reductions in the contingent response that accompany contingencies usually do not exclusively determine instrumental increases, but selective increases can contribute to the increase in time devoted to the instrumental response.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- UNINSTRUCTED HUMAN REPONDING: SENSITIVITY TO RATIO AND INTERVAL CONTINGENCIES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1977
- THE EFFECTS OF A COOPERATION CONTINGENCY ON BEHAVIOR IN A CONTINUOUS THREE‐PERSON ENVIRONMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1976
- CONTRAST, INDUCTION, FACILITATION, SUPPRESSION, AND CONSERVATION1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1976
- SWITCHING FROM COMPETITION TO SHARING OR COOPERATION AT LARGE RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS: COMPETITION REQUIRES MORE RESPONDING1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975
- The matching law and quantifications related to Premack's principle.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1975
- Instrumental and contingent saccharin licking in rats: Response deprivation and reinforcementLearning and Motivation, 1974
- SOME EFFECTS OF PUNISHMENT UPON UNPUNISHED RESPONDING1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972
- Contingency management of toothbrushing behavior in a summer camp for children1Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969
- What is the necessary and sufficient condition for reinforcement in the contingency situation?Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967
- Toward empirical behavior laws: I. Positive reinforcement.Psychological Review, 1959