Assessment of Identity Development: Current Issues and Future Directions
- 1 April 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Adolescent Research
- Vol. 1 (2) , 175-181
- https://doi.org/10.1177/074355488612004
Abstract
Over the past 20 years, much empirical work has accumulated to support Erikson's contention that identity formation is a pivotal developmental task of adolescence. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the three techniques of identity assessment most commonly in use at the present; to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each approach; and to make recommendations for future work, drawing from the literature on career exploration. The field is now at a point where more sensitive measurement is needed in order to understand the processes underlying identity development. Discussion integrates the traditional Erikson-Marcia identity research with the work currently being undertaken in the career development field in order to arrive at a more process-oriented characterization of identity formation.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- A conception of adult development.American Psychologist, 1986
- Development of an objective measure to assess ego identity in adolescence: Validation and replicationJournal of Youth and Adolescence, 1984
- The relative importance of identity status interview componentsJournal of Youth and Adolescence, 1983
- Development of the Career Exploration Survey (CES)Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1983
- The state of research on ego identity: A review and appraisalJournal of Youth and Adolescence, 1978
- Current contradictions in adolescent theoryJournal of Youth and Adolescence, 1978
- An Eriksonian measure of personality development in college students.Developmental Psychology, 1969
- Development and validation of ego-identity status.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966
- Relationship of Ego Identity to Psychosocial EffectivenessPsychological Reports, 1964
- Conflict, arousal, and curiosity.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1960