Failure of Automatic Mode Switching: Recognition and Management

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Dual chamher pacing is desirable to optimize AV synchrony and to potentially decrease the incidence of supraventricular tachyarrhythimas. Patients with alternating periods of both supraventricular tachyarrhythmias and bradycardia pose a difficult challenge when standard dual chamber pacemakers are implanted. The automatic mode switching algorithm was introduced to prevent tracking of paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythimas and avoid the adverse hemodynamic and symptomatic consequences of a rapid ventricular response. In some cases, failure to mode switch may take place when the atrial signal during tachycardia is of insufficient amplitude to be sensed. Failure to mode switch way also occur when the atrial signal periodically occurs in the atrial blanking period(s). In this article, we describe failure to mode switch in seven patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after a Telectronics Meta DDDR 1254 device was implanted. Each patient had paroxysmal atrial flutter and/or atrial fibrillation and presented with either repetitive episodes of oscillation between atrial tracking and mode switching to a nonatrial tracking pacing mode or complete failure to mode switch. Six of seven patients were taking antiarrhythmic drugs that resulted in slowing of the atrial cycle length. Pacemaker reprogramming was required in each case to restore reliable mode switching during subsequent recurrences of the atrial tachyarrhythmias. We conclude that careful pacemaker programming of patients with paroxysmal atrial flutter and the Telectronics Meta DDDR 1254 is necessary when patients are taking an antiarrhythmic drug that slows atrial cycle length.