Automated blood pressure measurement devices: A potential source of morbidity in preeclampsia?

This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:

• Automated blood pressure measurements in laboring women: Are they reliable?
  American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993
• COMPARISON OF AUTOMATIC OSCILLOMETRIC ARTERIAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENT WITH CONVENTIONAL AUSCULTATORY MEASUREMENT IN THE LABOUR WARD
  British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1993
• Blood pressure monitoring: Automated oscillometric devices
  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1991
• The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems
  Journal Of Hypertension, 1990
• STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
  The Lancet, 1986
• An Evaluation of Automated Indirect Blood Pressure Measurement During Pregnancy
  Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1986
• An assessment of the Dinamap 845
  Anaesthesia, 1984
• Noninvasive estimation of central aortic pressure using the oscillometric method for analyzing systemic artery pulsatile blood flow: Comparative study of indirect systolic, diastolic, and mean brachial artery pressure with simultaneous direct ascending aortic pressure measurements
  American Heart Journal, 1982
• Clinical evaluation of the Dinamap noninvasive blood pressure monitor in pre-term neonates
  Clinical Physics and Physiological Measurement, 1981
• Blood pressure measurement in shock. Mechanism of inaccuracy in ausculatory and palpatory methods
  JAMA, 1967