Frequency Response Differences of Four Gain-Equalized Hearing Aid Prescription Formulae
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Audiology
- Vol. 31 (2) , 87-94
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099209072904
Abstract
The relative differences between the NAL, Berger, Lybarger und POGO hearing aid prescriptions were evaluated using 8 hypothetical audiograms and 81 actual hearing loss cases. The gains of the prescriptions were equalized, making the prescriptions maximally similar, as would presumably occur when the aids are worn. Statistically significant differences in the frequency responses of the prescriptions were found, with up to 17 dB gain difference observed; however, the gain differences at any given frequency were generally less than 8 dB. Sharply sloping hearing losses had the greatest differences between prescriptions. The NAL and Berger prescriptions were most disparate, while POGO and Lybarger were most similar. As large differences in prescribed gain are rare, research into the relevance of such small differences in frequency response is advocated as a precursor to study of the optimal prescription formula.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- The National Acoustic Laboratoriesʼ (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing AidEar & Hearing, 1986
- An Evaluation of Several Rationales for Selecting Hearing Aid GainJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1986
- Selecting the Gain of Hearing Aids for Persons with Sensorineural Hearing ImpairmentsScandinavian Audiology, 1976