ASSESSING CHANGES IN RISK FACTOR EFFECT OVER MULTIPLE LEVELS OF SEVERITY
- 1 March 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 127 (3) , 663-673
- https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114841
Abstract
Use of the logistic function has become standard for regression of proportions onto risk factors, but where multiple levels of response are recorded, several different techniques are common. For most purposes, the “inclusive” method is most appropriate. However, if investigation is focused directly on the pattern of risk factor effects over levels of severity, the inclusive method is too conservative, because its overlapping categories tend to minimize any real differences among risk factor effects at separate levels. Several alternative techniques maximize these estimated differences, but interpretation of their results is much more sensitive to the assumed model than is estimation of category frequencies. In most cases, it is not possible to know precisely what model actually generated the data at hand. Therefore, a procedure is recommended which combines the safety of the inclusive method with an adjuvant technique called the “continuation ratio” method which has greater power to disclose differences between risk factor effects at different levels of response.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- TEN-YEAR INCIDENCE OF CORONARY HEART DISEASE IN THE HONOLULU HEART PROGRAMAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1984
- FOUR AND TWO-THIRDS YEARS INCIDENCE OF CORONARY HEART DISEASE IN MIDDLE-AGED MEN: THE OSLO STUDYAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1980
- Identifying subsets of major risk factors in multivariate estimation of coronary riskJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1977
- Models for Complex Contingency Tables and Polychotomous Dosage Response CurvesBiometrics, 1966