Abstract
Benjamin (1962) introduced the idea that a given ‘primary’ swirling flow, with cylindrical stream surfaces, may have associated with it ‘conjugate flows’, also swirling and cylindrical, which in a certain sense are equivalent to the primary one. He deduced that, in cases where such conjugate flows exist and where the primary flow cannot support standing waves of small amplitude, the conjugate flow nearest the primary one (a) can support such waves, and (b) has a ‘flow force’ greater than that of the primary flow. In the present paper these two results are proved rigorously by a method which differs from Benjamin's.

This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit: