Relationship between dipole parameter estimation errors and measurement conditions in magnetoencephalography
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Vol. 40 (9) , 919-924
- https://doi.org/10.1109/10.245613
Abstract
The relationship between dipole parameter estimation errors and measurement conditions in magnetoencephalography is determined by computer simulation. The model uses a single current dipole in a spherical homogeneous medium. Dipole parameters are estimated using a moving dipole procedure. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is defined as the square-root of the ratio of the average signal power to the average noise power over all measurement points. At SNR > 20, accurate estimation can be carried out independently of dipole depth and coil size. At SNR < 20, dipole depth influences estimation error. When the dipole is located near the center of the sphere, the measurement region should include both extrema of the magnetic field to minimize estimation error. However, when the dipole is not so deep, the position of the measurement region does not influence estimation error. When SNR < 4, estimation error increases as coil size increases. Coil size minimizing estimation error is determined by the ratio of environmental magnetic field noise to electrical noise. For a constant size of measurement region, increasing the number of measurement points decreases estimation error to a certain level. This error level depends on SNR. The number of measurement points required to minimize estimation error also depends on SNR.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Details of simulated annealing algorithm to estimate parameters of multiple current dipoles using biomagnetic dataIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 1992
- Maximum-likelihood estimation of current-dipole parameters for data obtained using multichannel magnetometerIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1992
- An improved method for localizing electric brain dipolesIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1990
- Spatial resolution of neuromagnetic records: theoretical calculations in a spherical modelElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1988
- MCG inverse solution: influence of coil size, grid size, number of coils, and SNRIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1988
- A Comparison of Moving Dipole Inverse Solutions Using EEG's and MEG'sIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1985
- Somatosensory evoked cerebral magnetic fields from SI and SII in manElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1984
- Effects of detector coil size and configuration on measurements of the magnetoencephalogramJournal of Applied Physics, 1983
- Biomagnetic instrumentationReview of Scientific Instruments, 1982
- Magnetic Fields of a Dipole in Special Volume Conductor ShapesIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1977