The XMM-Ω project
Open Access
- 28 November 2003
- journal article
- letter
- Published by EDP Sciences in Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Vol. 412 (2) , L37-L41
- https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20034603
Abstract
The evolution with redshift of the temperature-luminosity relation of X-ray galaxy clusters is a key ingredient to break degeneracies in the interpretation of X-ray clusters redshift number counts. We therefore take advantage of the recent measurements of the temperature-luminosity relation of distant clusters observed with XMM-Newton and Chandra satellites to examine theoretical number counts expected for different available X-rays cluster samples, namely the RDCS, EMSS, SHARC, 160 deg2 and the MACS at redshift greater than 0.3. We derive these counts without any adjustment, using models previously normalized to the local () temperature distribution function (TDF) and to the high-z () TDF. We find that these models having in the range [0.85–1.] predict counts in remarkable agreement with the observed counts in the different samples. We illustrate that this conclusion is weakly sensitive to the various ingredients of the modeling. Therefore number counts provide a robust evidence of an evolving population. A realistic flat low density model (), normalized to the local abundance of clusters is found to overproduce cluster abundance at high redshift (above ) by nearly an order of magnitude. This result is in conflict with the popular concordance model. The conflict could indicate a deviation from the expected scaling of the relation with redshift.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- An alternative to the cosmological “concordance model”Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2003
- Measuring Ωmwith theROSATDeep Cluster SurveyThe Astrophysical Journal, 2001
- MACS: A Quest for the Most Massive Galaxy Clusters in the UniverseThe Astrophysical Journal, 2001
- Cosmological Constraints from theROSATDeep Cluster SurveyThe Astrophysical Journal, 1999
- Measuring 0 using cluster evolutionMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1998
- Statistical Properties of X‐Ray Clusters: Analytic and Numerical ComparisonsThe Astrophysical Journal, 1998
- Is the Cluster Temperature Function a Reliable Test for Ω0?The Astrophysical Journal, 1997
- The Southern SHARC Survey: the [CLC][ITAL]z[/ITAL][/CLC] = 0.3–0.7 Cluster X-Ray Luminosity FunctionThe Astrophysical Journal, 1997
- The extended medium sensitivity survey distant cluster sample - X-ray data and interpretation of the luminosity evolutionThe Astrophysical Journal, 1992
- The Einstein Observatory Extended Medium-Sensitivity Survey. I - X-ray data and analysisThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 1990