Scaling the Hierarchy: How and Why Investment Banks Compete for Syndicate Co-management Appointments
- 22 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 22 (10) , 3977-4007
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn106
Abstract
We show that relatively optimistic research and even the mere provision of research coverage for the issuer (regardless of its direction) attract co-management appointments for securities offerings. Co-management appointments are valuable because they help banks establish relationships with issuers. These relationships, in turn, substantially increase the banks’ chances of winning more lucrative lead-management mandates in the future. This is true even in the presence of historically exclusive banking relationships.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Whom You Know Matters: Venture Capital Networks and Investment PerformanceThe Journal of Finance, 2007
- On the Benefits of Concurrent Lending and UnderwritingThe Journal of Finance, 2005
- The Role of IPO Underwriting Syndicates: Pricing, Information Production, and Underwriter CompetitionThe Journal of Finance, 2005
- Do Initial Public Offering Firms Purchase Analyst Coverage with Underpricing?The Journal of Finance, 2004
- Analyzing the Analysts: Career Concerns and Biased Earnings ForecastsThe Journal of Finance, 2003
- The Seven Percent SolutionThe Journal of Finance, 2000
- Industry costs of equityPublished by Elsevier ,1998
- Bank Underwriting of Debt Securities: Modern EvidenceThe Review of Financial Studies, 1997
- Sample Selection Bias as a Specification ErrorEconometrica, 1979
- Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identificationThe Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1972