And Yet the Small-Sample Effect Does Hold: Reply to Juslin and Olsson (2005) and Anderson, Doherty, Berg, and Friedrich (2005).
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychological Review
- Vol. 112 (1) , 280-285
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.112.1.280
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sample Size and the Detection of Correlation--A Signal Detection Account: Comment on Kareev (2000) and Juslin and Olsson (2005).Psychological Review, 2005
- Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting smallPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Seven (indeed, plus or minus two) and the detection of correlations.Psychological Review, 2000
- Through a narrow window: working memory capacity and the detection of covariationCognition, 1995
- Maturational constraints on language learningCognitive Science, 1990
- Constraints on learning and their role in language acquisition: Studies of the acquisition of American sign languageLanguage Sciences, 1988
- Limitations on input as a basis for neural organization and perceptual development: A preliminary theoretical statementDevelopmental Psychobiology, 1982
- What features make samples seem representative?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980
- The role of sample size in sample evaluationOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979
- Belief in the law of small numbers.Psychological Bulletin, 1971