Are apes really inequity averse?
- 26 September 2006
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 273 (1605) , 3123-3128
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3693
Abstract
Brosnan et al. (Brosnan, S. F. Schiff, H. C. & de Waal, F. B. M. 2005 Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proc. R. Soc. B272, 253-258) found that chimpanzees showed increased levels of rejection for less-preferred food when competitors received better food than themselves and postulated as an explanation inequity aversion. In the present study, we extended these findings by adding important control conditions, and we investigated whether inequity aversion could also be found in the other great ape species and whether it would be influenced by subjects' relationship with the competitor. In the present study, subjects showed a pattern of food rejection opposite to the subjects of the above study by Brosnan et al. (2005). Our apes ignored fewer food pieces and stayed longer in front of the experimenter when a conspecific received better food than themselves. Moreover, chimpanzees begged more vigorously when the conspecific got favoured food. The most plausible explanation for these results is the food expectation hypothesis - seeing another individual receive high-quality food creates the expectation of receiving the same food oneself - and not inequity aversion.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Social Influences Affect Food Neophobia in Captive Chimpanzees: A Comparative ApproachPublished by Springer Nature ,2006
- Are capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) inequity averse?Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2006
- Partial support from a nonreplication: Comment on Roma, Silberberg, Ruggiero, and Suomi (2006).Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2006
- Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzeesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2005
- ‘Unwilling’ versus ‘unable’: chimpanzees’ understanding of human intentional actionDevelopmental Science, 2004
- Third-party punishment and social normsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- The nature of human altruismNature, 2003
- Monkeys reject unequal payNature, 2003
- Précis ofFrustration Theory: An Analysis of Dispositional Learning and MemoryPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1994
- Motivational properties of frustration: I. Effect on a running response of the addition of frustration to the motivational complex.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952