Uterine-Artery Embolization versus Surgery for Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 25 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 356 (4) , 360-370
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa062003
Abstract
The efficacy and safety of uterine-artery embolization, as compared with standard surgical methods, for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids remain uncertain.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Fibroid Registry for Outcomes Data (FIBROID) for Uterine EmbolizationObstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Hysterectomy for benign conditionsBMJ, 2005
- EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomyHealth Technology Assessment, 2004
- ACOG Committee Opinion #293: Uterine Artery EmbolizationObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Reporting Standards for Uterine Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Uterine LeiomyomataJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2001
- 2 Clinical presentation of uterine fibroidsBailliere's Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1998
- Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: A non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimationHealth Economics, 1997
- Making sense of ambiguity: evaluation in internal reliability and face validity of the SF 36 questionnaire in women presenting with menorrhagia.Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1996
- Randomised trial comparing hysterectomy and transcervical endometrial resection: effect on health related quality of life and costs two years after surgeryBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- Arterial embolisation to treat uterine myomataThe Lancet, 1995