A Pooled Analysis of Vitamin D Dose Requirements for Fracture Prevention
Top Cited Papers
- 5 July 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 367 (1) , 40-49
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1109617
Abstract
The results of meta-analyses examining the relationship between vitamin D supplementation and fracture reduction have been inconsistent. We pooled participant-level data from 11 double-blind, randomized, controlled trials of oral vitamin D supplementation (daily, weekly, or every 4 months), with or without calcium, as compared with placebo or calcium alone in persons 65 years of age or older. Primary end points were the incidence of hip and any nonvertebral fractures according to Cox regression analyses, with adjustment for age group, sex, type of dwelling, and study. Our primary aim was to compare data from quartiles of actual intake of vitamin D (including each individual participant's adherence to the treatment and supplement use outside the study protocol) in the treatment groups of all trials with data from the control groups. We included 31,022 persons (mean age, 76 years; 91% women) with 1111 incident hip fractures and 3770 nonvertebral fractures. Participants who were randomly assigned to receive vitamin D, as compared with those assigned to control groups, had a nonsignificant 10% reduction in the risk of hip fracture (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.01) and a 7% reduction in the risk of nonvertebral fracture (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.99). By quartiles of actual intake, reduction in the risk of fracture was shown only at the highest intake level (median, 800 IU daily; range, 792 to 2000), with a 30% reduction in the risk of hip fracture (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.86) and a 14% reduction in the risk of any nonvertebral fracture (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.96). Benefits at the highest level of vitamin D intake were fairly consistent across subgroups defined by age group, type of dwelling, baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D level, and additional calcium intake. High-dose vitamin D supplementation (≥800 IU daily) was somewhat favorable in the prevention of hip fracture and any nonvertebral fracture in persons 65 years of age or older. (Funded by the Swiss National Foundations and others.)Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The 2011 Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D: What Dietetics Practitioners Need to KnowJournal of the American Dietetic Association, 2011
- Patient level pooled analysis of 68 500 patients from seven major vitamin D fracture trials in US and EuropeBMJ, 2010
- Dietary Calcium and Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Status in Relation to BMD Among U.S. AdultsJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2009
- Effect of annual intramuscular vitamin D on fracture risk in elderly men and women a population-based, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trialRheumatology, 2007
- Calcium plus Vitamin D Supplementation and the Risk of FracturesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Relationship Between Serum Parathyroid Hormone Levels, Vitamin D Sufficiency, and Calcium IntakeJAMA, 2005
- Should Older People in Residential Care Receive Vitamin D to Prevent Falls? Results of a Randomized TrialJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2005
- Effect of four monthly oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation on fractures and mortality in men and women living in the community: randomised double blind controlled trialBMJ, 2003
- Effects of a Short-Term Vitamin D and Calcium Supplementation on Body Sway and Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Elderly WomenJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2000
- Effect of Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation on Bone Density in Men and Women 65 Years of Age or OlderNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997