A comparison of three-year survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 33 (1) , 63-72
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00540-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Five-Year Clinical and Functional Outcome Comparing Bypass Surgery and Angioplasty in Patients With Multivessel Coronary DiseaseA Multicenter Randomized TrialPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- Comparison of Coronary Bypass Surgery with Angioplasty in Patients with Multivessel DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Long-term survival benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with coronary artery diseaseThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1996
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Coronary Angioplasty with Coronary Bypass SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- A Randomized Study of Coronary Angioplasty Compared with Bypass Surgery in Patients with Symptomatic Multivessel Coronary DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trialThe Lancet, 1993
- The Evolution of Medical and Surgical Therapy for Coronary Artery DiseaseJAMA, 1989
- Prognostic value of angiographic indices of coronary artery disease from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS).Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1983
- Nonoperative Dilatation of Coronary-Artery StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Direct myocardial revascularization: A ten year journey: Myths and realitiesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1979