Effectiveness and Acceptability of a Domiciliary Multidrug Inhalation Treatment in Elderly Patients with Chronic Airflow Obstruction: Metered Dose Inhaler Versus Jet Nebulizer
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Aerosol Medicine
- Vol. 13 (1) , 25-33
- https://doi.org/10.1089/jam.2000.13.25
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the immediate and long-term bronchodilator effect as well as the patient acceptability of a 2-week, multidrug, inhalation treatment delivered by a metered dose inhaler (MDI) versus a jet nebulizer in a group of elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma and an at least partially reversible airflow obstruction. Twenty elderly outpatients (17 men; mean ± SD age, 67 ± 2 years; mean ± SD baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], 46.5 ± 14% of predicted value) with COPD or asthma participated in the study, which was of an open, randomized, crossover design. After a 1-day baseline evaluation, including patient history, clinical examination, and spirometry, participants were randomly assigned to receive a multidrug inhalation treatment (a combination of salbutamol, ipratropium, and flunisolide) with either an MDI or a jet nebulizer. Two weeks later, they were shifted to treatment with the alternative system for a further 2 weeks. FEV1 was measured on the first and fourteenth days of each treatment period, on each occasion both before and 30 minutes after the morning inhalation. At the end of the study, patients were asked to express a personal preference for one of the two inhalation treatments with regard to effectiveness and acceptability by filling out a simple questionnaire. Both the MDI and jet nebulizer had a significant immediate bronchodilator effect on the first and fourteenth days of treatment, with no differences between treatments. No long-term bronchodilator effect was seen with either aerosol delivery system. Patient preferences were clearly in favor of the jet nebulizer with regard to effectiveness and in favor of the MDI with regard to acceptability. In conclusion, in elderly patients with COPD or asthma and partially reversible airflow obstruction, a maintenance multidrug bronchodilator/anti-inflammatory inhalation treatment produced a statistically significant and clinically relevant bronchodilator effect without substantial differences between the two delivery systems. Most patients considered the MDI to be more acceptable and the jet nebulizer to be more effective. These preferences should be taken into consideration when prescribing a maintenance aerosol inhalation treatment.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Metered Dost Inhaler: Past, Present, and FutureAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 1998
- Optimal assessment and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The European Respiratory Society Task ForceEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1995
- An open, prospective comparison of beta 2 agonists given via nebuliser, Nebuhaler, or pressurised inhaler by ambulance crew as emergency treatment.Thorax, 1995
- A device for overcoming discoordination with metered-dose inhalersJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1993
- Advantages of Pressurized Canister Metered Dose InhalersJournal of Aerosol Medicine, 1991
- Control of Asthma by AerosolsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Comparison of three techniques of inhalation on the airway response to terbutaline.Thorax, 1983
- Domiciliary nebulised salbutamol solution in severe chronic airway obstruction.Thorax, 1980
- Aerosolized terbutaline in asthmatics *1Comparison of dosage strength, schedule, and method of administrationJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1979