Why Japanese citizens evaluate the new indirect tax as unfair: Fairness criteria and their relative importance
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Social Justice Research
- Vol. 4 (3) , 251-263
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01048400
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using diaries to promote procedural justice in performance appraisalsSocial Justice Research, 1987
- The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behaviorSocial Justice Research, 1987
- Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Rethinking Equity TheoryPublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- The Distributive Justice of Organizational Performance EvaluationsPublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- Procedural Justice, Participation, and the Fair Process Effect in Groups and OrganizationsPublished by Springer Nature ,1983
- Why Justice? Normative and Instrumental Interpretations11This chapter was prepared while the senior author was in residence as a Fulbright research scholar at the Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. We acknowledge the support of that institution and the Commission for Educational Exchange between the United States of America, Belgium, and Luxemburg.Published by Elsevier ,1982
- Approaching Equity and Avoiding Inequity in Groups and OrganizationsPublished by Elsevier ,1982
- Determinations of participant and observer satisfaction with adversary and inquisitorial modes of adjudication.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978
- Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of voice and improvement on experienced inequity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977