Use of sputter coating to prepare whole mounts of cytoskeletons for transmission and high‐resolution scanning and scanning transmission electron microscopy

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This paper describes the use of sputter coating to prepare detergent-extracted cytoskeletons for observation by scanning (SEM), scanning transmission (STEM), inverted contrast STEM, and transmission (TEM) electron microscopy. Sputtered coats of 1–2 nm of platinum or tungsten provide both an adequate secondary electron signal for SEM and good contrast for STEM and TEM. At the same time, the grain size of the coating is sufficiently fine to be just at (platinum) or below (tungsten) the limit of resolution for SEM and STEM. In TEM, the granular structure of platinum coats is resolved, and platinum decoration artifacts are observed on the surface of structures. The platinum is deposited as small islands with a periodic distribution that may reveal information about the underlying molecular structure. This method produces samples that are similar in appearance to replicas prepared by low-angle rotary shadowing with platinum and carbon. However, the sputter-coating method is easier to use; more widely available to investigators; and compatible with SEM, STEM, and TEM. It may also be combined with immunogold and other labeling methods. While TEM provides the highest resolution images of sputter-coated cytoskeletons, it also damages the specimens owing to heating in the beam. In SEM and STEM cytoskeletons are stable and the resolution is adequate to resolve individual microfilaments. The best single method for visualizing cytoskeletons is inverted contrast STEM, which images both the metal-coated cytoskeletal structures and electron-dense material within the nucleus and cytoplasm as white against a dark background. STEM and TEM were both suitable for visualizing colloidal gold particles in immunolabeled samples.