Antigrowth Politics or Piecemeal Resistance?
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Urban Affairs Review
- Vol. 35 (3) , 334-357
- https://doi.org/10.1177/107808740003500303
Abstract
Regime theory predicts that opponents of a regime’s pursuit of economic development will have limited prospects for success. Some scholars, however, contend that evidence of widespread growth control movements poses a challenge to regime theory. The authors assess the viability of growth opponents when confronting an active growth regime under conditions that should enhance the prospects for the development of an antigrowth movement by examining opposition to Olympic-related growth in Los Angeles (1984), Atlanta (1996), and Salt Lake City (2002). Despite favorable circumstances for developing an opposition coalition, little evidence of viable antigrowth movements is found. Rather, opposition is better characterized as piecemeal resistance.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Explaining the vote for slow growthPublic Choice, 1995
- Citizen Mobilization and the Adoption of Local Growth ControlThe Western Political Quarterly, 1992
- VOTING ON GROWTH CONTROL MEASURES: PREFERENCES AND STRATEGIES*Economics & Politics, 1992
- The Urban AntiregimeUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1992
- Growth Machines and Ballot Box Planning: The San Diego CaseJournal of Urban Affairs, 1992
- The Urban Transformation of a Landmark EventUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1990
- Neighborhood AssociationsUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1990
- Constituency of the Antigrowth MovementUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1986
- Growth Policies and Community StatusUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1983
- The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of PlaceAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1976