Trifluoromethylthio-complexes of platinum(II): measurement of trans-influence by fluorine-19 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
- 1 January 1975
- journal article
- Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) in J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
- No. 11,p. 990-998
- https://doi.org/10.1039/dt9750000990
Abstract
The synthesis and characterization of the following new complexes is reported: trans-[PtX(SCF3)(PEt3)2](X = Ph, Me, H, CF3, C2F3, CN, NO2, SCF3, N3, I, NCS, NCO, Br, Cl, or NO3), cis-[PtX(SCF3)(PEt3)2](X = NO2, SCF3, N3, NCS, NCO, Cl, or NO3), cis-[Pt(SCF3)2L2][L = PBun 3, P(OPh)3, PPh3, P(OMe)3, PCIPh2, or C5H5N], trans-[Pt(SCF3)2L2](L = PBun 3, PPh3, or C5H5N). trans-[Pt(SCF3)(CH3)(PPh3)2], and trans-[Ptl(CF3)(PEt3)2]. Values of 3J(Pt–F) in trans-[PtX(SCF3)(PEt3)2] and cis-[Pt(SCF3)2L2] complexes are used to establish a scale of trans-influence for the X and L ligands and the results are discussed in terms of existing theories of the Fermi contact interaction. It is concluded that an equation similar to those used previously for directly bound and two-bond couplings is still approximately valid for the longer-range 3J(Pt–F) couplings. The question of nonzero intercepts in plots comparing trans-influence scales derived from couplings to different indicator ligands is discussed. A perturbation approach to the problem shows that non-zero intercepts arise when the indicator ligands have different sensitivities to the perturbation. One possible cause of differing sensitivities is the polarizability of the indicator ligand.Keywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: