Constraints on Somatotopic Organization in the Primary Motor Cortex
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 86 (5) , 2125-2143
- https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2001.86.5.2125
Abstract
Since the 1870s, the primary motor cortex (M1) has been known to have a somatotopic organization, with different regions of cortex participating in control of face, arm, and leg movements. Through the middle of the 20th century, it seemed possible that the principle of somatotopic organization extended to the detailed representation of different body parts within each of the three major representations. The arm region of M1, for example, was thought to contain a well-ordered, point-to-point representation of the movements or muscles of the thumb, index, middle, ring, and little fingers, the wrist, elbow, and shoulder, as conveyed by the iconic homunculus and simiusculus. In the last quarter of the 20th century, however, experimental evidence has accumulated indicating that within-limb somatotopy in M1 is not spatially discrete nor sequentially ordered. Rather, beneath gradual somatotopic gradients of representation, the representations of different smaller body parts or muscles each are distributed widely within the face, arm, or leg representation, such that the representations of any two smaller parts overlap extensively. Appreciation of this underlying organization will be essential to further understanding of the contribution to control of movement made by M1. Because no single experiment disproves a well-ordered within-limb somatotopic organization in M1, here I review the accumulated evidence, using a framework of six major features that constrain the somatotopic organization of M1: convergence of output, divergence of output, horizontal interconnections, distributed activation, effects of lesions, and ability to reorganize. Review of the classic experiments that led to development of the homunculus and simiusculus shows that these data too were consistent with distributed within-limb somatotopy. I conclude with speculations on what the constrained somatotopy of M1 might tell us about its contribution to control of movement.Keywords
This publication has 119 references indexed in Scilit:
- Representation of cortical motor function as revealed by stereotactic transcranial magnetic stimulationElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control, 1998
- Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learningNature, 1995
- Discrete cortical infarction with prominent impairment of thumb flexion.Stroke, 1993
- How Somatotopic Is the Motor Cortex Hand Area?Science, 1993
- How might the motor cortex individuate movements?Trends in Neurosciences, 1990
- Divergent projection of individual corticospinal axons to motoneurons of multiple muscles in the monkeyNeuroscience Letters, 1981
- Peripheral afferent inputs to the forelimb area of the monkey motor cortex: Input-output relationsExperimental Brain Research, 1972
- Topographical organization of cortical efferent zones projecting to distal forelimb muscles in the monkeyExperimental Brain Research, 1972
- SOMATIC MOTOR AND SENSORY REPRESENTATION IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF MAN AS STUDIED BY ELECTRICAL STIMULATIONBrain, 1937
- VI. A minute analysis (experiments) of the various movements produced by stimulating in the monkey different regions of the cortical centre for the upper limb, as defined by Professor FerrierPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. (B.), 1887