Newspaper Coverage of the Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Report
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Science Communication
- Vol. 18 (2) , 153-164
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547096018002004
Abstract
The accuracy of medical stories in newspapers is a controversial issue. This study evaluated the accuracy of newspaper reports on an annual consumer report that reports the expected number of deaths following bypass surgery conducted in Pennsylvania hospitals. Analysis of 42 articles published following the 1994 report identified 52 factual errors, 127 mistakes in technical terms, 29 misspellings of proper names, and 7 misquotations. Daily newspapers averaged 5.61 errors per article, weekly newspapers averaged 4.33 errors per article, and trade publications averaged 2.83 errors per article. The authors conclude that trade publications appear to have provided the most accurate coverage and recommend development of a voluntary certification program for science reporters and that scientists be encouraged to seek additional training in newspaper relations.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- A National Survey of Public Health Officers' Interactions With the MediaJAMA, 1994
- Women's health and the mass media: The reporting of riskWomen's Health Issues, 1993
- Medical Researchers and the MediaJAMA, 1992
- The Magical Medical Media TourJAMA, 1992
- Mass Voluntary Immunization Campaigns for Meningococcal Disease in Canada: Media HysteriaPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1992
- Science Sections in U.S. Newspapers Increase Dramatically in Past 2 YearsScience, 1987
- Between scientists and public: Communicating psychological research through the mass media.American Psychologist, 1982
- Communication Accuracy in Magazine Science ReportingJournalism Quarterly, 1978
- Follow-Up of Study of Science News AccuracyJournalism Quarterly, 1976
- News Source Perceptions of Accuracy of Science CoverageJournalism Quarterly, 1974