CHARGING FOR PUBLIC SERVICES
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Public Administration
- Vol. 68 (3) , 297-313
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1990.tb00761.x
Abstract
Our understanding of charges for public goods and services is currently deficient because of a lack of an empirically relevant political framework for analysing information and data about charges for public programmes. This paper analyses the context and practice of charging for programmes and reports evidence of the great variety of charges now employed by British government. The pattern shown cannot be explained by prescriptive theories of market efficiency or merit goods, as an effort to obtain signals independent of revenue, or by party differences; the pattern must be understood as an historical inheritance. To understand inherited commitments it is necessary to secure answers to nine questions in a paradigm of who pays what, when and how. Three steps that British government could take to improve knowledge of charges currently accounting for £9bn in public income are identified in the conclusion.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stars to Steer By: The Political Impact of Moral ValuesJournal of Public Policy, 1989
- Individual Irrationality and Public Policy: In Search of Merit/Demerit PoliciesJournal of Public Policy, 1987
- The Politics of Blame AvoidanceJournal of Public Policy, 1986
- Increasing Patient Charges in the National Health Service: A Method of Privatizing Primary CareJournal of Social Policy, 1986
- Maximizing Tax Revenue While Minimizing Political CostsJournal of Public Policy, 1985
- Access to WelfarePublished by Springer Nature ,1983
- Policies, Presumptions and Prospects in Charging for the Social ServicesPublished by Springer Nature ,1980
- Issues in Pricing PolicyPublished by Springer Nature ,1980
- Models of Man.Economica, 1957
- The Pure Theory of Public ExpenditureThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1954