Biaxial Mechanical Properties of Carotid Arteries From Normotensive and Hypertensive Rats

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Abstract Hypertension is known to decrease arterial distensibility and volumetric compliance, as reported from pressure-volume experiments and ring and strip studies of human and animal large arteries. However, recent data using noninvasive in vivo recording of vessel diameter suggest that the cross-sectional compliance of large arteries can be unchanged or even increased in hypertensive subjects. The present study was performed to test the hypothesis that differences between volumetric and cross-sectional compliance could be related to differences in biaxial mechanical properties in normotensive and hypertensive rats. In normotensive (Wistar-Kyoto [WKY]) rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) we measured the simultaneous changes in length and diameter of in situ isolated carotid arteries submitted to static pressures (50 to 200 mm Hg by steps of 25 mm Hg each). Carotid artery diameters and lengths were determined by video microscopy and computer-assisted image analysis. At low transmural pressure (50 mm Hg), carotid artery diameter was 710±41 μm in WKY rats and 980±31 μm in SHR ( P <.01). In response to pressure increases, the carotid diameter increased by 91±6% in WKY rats and by 41±4% in SHR ( P <.01). In parallel, the percent increase in carotid length was much larger in WKY rats than in SHR (31±2% versus 7±1%, respectively; P <.01). In WKY rats, longitudinal distensibility causes significantly larger volumetric values than cross-sectional compliance values; in contrast, because of the very small longitudinal distensibility, volumetric and cross-sectional compliances are almost identical in SHR. In conclusion, the present study suggests that biaxial mechanical properties of arteries could play a role in the damping function of the arterial tree and that measurements of cross-sectional compliance should be interpreted cautiously in normotensive and hypertensive rats when compared with volumetric compliance.