Token Resistance to Sex
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychology of Women Quarterly
- Vol. 22 (3) , 443-463
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00167.x
Abstract
According to the traditional sexual script, women—but not men—engage in token resistance to sex, refusing when they actually intend to engage in sex. Several studies have found that over a third of the college women sampled reported refusing sexual intercourse when they intended to engage in it. We asked 65 women and 64 men to write narratives describing their experiences conforming to the definition of token resistance used in previous studies. As in previous research, both women and men reported engaging in token resistance. However, most respondents apparently misunderstood the definition because they wrote narratives that did not meet this definition. These results refute the stereotype that most women—and only women—engage in token resistance to sex. Furthermore, these results cast doubt on prevalence data reported in previous studies. Results indicate that the overwhelming majority of women and men who say “no” to sex actually mean no.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Detecting the Scope of RapeJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 1993
- Technologies and Effects of Heterosexual CoercionFeminism & Psychology, 1992
- Same Door, Different Closet: A Heterosexual Sissy's Coming-Out PartyFeminism & Psychology, 1992
- Theorizing HeterosexualityFeminism & Psychology, 1992
- "Nice Women" Don't Say Yes and "Real Men" Don't Say NoWomen & Therapy, 1988
- Dominance and Inequality in X-Rated VideocassettesPsychology of Women Quarterly, 1988
- Social desirability in the bedroom: Role of approval motivation in sexual relationshipsSex Roles, 1984
- Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- The effects of mass media exposure on acceptance of violence against women: A field experimentJournal of Research in Personality, 1981
- Reference Groups and Sex Conduct Norm ViolationsThe Sociological Quarterly, 1967