Forceps Compared With Vacuum
- 1 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 106 (5, Part 1) , 908-912
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000182616.39503.b2
Abstract
To compare perinatal outcomes between forceps- and vacuum-assisted deliveries. Our hypothesis was that the force vectors achieved in forceps delivery will lead to fewer shoulder dystocias, but greater perineal lacerations. This was a retrospective cohort study of 4,120 term, cephalic, singleton, nonrotational operative vaginal deliveries at a single institution. Outcomes examined included rates of neonatal trauma, shoulder dystocia, and perineal lacerations. Potential confounders, including maternal age, birthweight, ethnicity, parity, station at delivery, episiotomy, attending physician, anesthesia, and length of labor, were controlled for using multivariate logistic regression. Among the 2,075 (50.4%) forceps- and 2,045 (49.6%) vacuum-assisted deliveries, the rate of shoulder dystocia was lower among women undergoing forceps delivery (1.5% compared with 3.5%, P < .001), as was the rate of cephalohematoma (4.5% compared with 14.8%, P < .001), whereas the rate of third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration was higher (36.9% compared with 26.8%, P < .001). These differences in perinatal complications persisted when controlling for the confounders listed above. The adjusted odds ratio for shoulder dystocia was 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.57), for cephalohematoma was 0.25 (95% CI 0.19-0.33), and for third- or fourth-degree lacerations was 1.79 (95% CI 1.52-2.10) when comparing forceps to vacuum. Vacuum-assisted vaginal birth is more often associated with shoulder dystocia and cephalohematoma. Forceps delivery is more often associated with third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations. These differences in complications rates should be considered among other factors when determining the optimal mode of delivery. II-2.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- U.S. Trends in Obstetric Procedures, 1990–2000Birth, 2002
- Operative delivery during labour: trends and predictive factorsPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2002
- Comparison of Maternal and Infant Outcomes between Vacuum Extraction and Forceps DeliveriesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Effect of Mode of Delivery in Nulliparous Women on Neonatal Intracranial InjuryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- A randomized prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus the M-cup vacuum extractorAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Forceps or Vacuum Extraction? A Comparison of Effects on the Newborn InfantActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1986