Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches
- 1 January 2006
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
In both corporate finance and asset pricing empirical work, researchers are often confronted with panel data. In these data sets, the residuals may be correlated across firms or across time, and OLS standard errors can be biased. Historically, the two literatures have used different solutions to this problem. Corporate finance has relied on clustered standard errors, while asset pricing has used the Fama-MacBeth procedure. This paper examines the different methods used in the literature and explains when the different methods yield the same (and correct) standard errors and when they diverge. The intent is to provide intuition as to why the different approaches sometimes give different answers and give researchers guidance for their use.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Informed Trading in Stock and Option MarketsThe Journal of Finance, 2004
- Why constrain your mutual fund manager?Journal of Financial Economics, 2004
- Founding‐Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500The Journal of Finance, 2003
- Stock Return Characteristics, Skew Laws, and the Differential Pricing of Individual Equity OptionsThe Review of Financial Studies, 2003
- How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?Published by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2002
- Market Timing and Capital StructureThe Journal of Finance, 2002
- When Does the Market Matter? Stock Prices and the Investment of Equity-Dependent FirmsPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2002
- Managerial timing and corporate liquidity:Journal of Financial Economics, 2001
- Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix EstimationEconometrica, 1991
- PRACTITIONERS’ CORNER: Computing Robust Standard Errors for Within‐groups Estimators*Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1987