Comparison of stool immunoassay with standard methods for detecting Helicobacter pylori infection
- 27 November 1999
- Vol. 319 (7222) , 1409
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7222.1409
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori is the cause of type B gastritis and associated with peptic ulcer disease. Various methods are available for detecting H pylori , but all have limitations.1 H pylori infection can be diagnosed by tests requiring endoscopy (rapid urease test, histology, culture) and by non-invasive tests (carbon-13 urea breath test, serology, stool tests). The urea breath test is currently the most important test for follow up after H pylori treatment.1 Serology is widely used for screening patients for H pylori infection; it has a good sensitivity, is fast, and relatively inexpensive.1 However, the urea breath test is expensive and requires specialised equipment, and serological tests cannot be used after H pylori treatment and may have a lower specificity. Most patients infected with H pylori are treated by general practitioners, who need an easy …Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The most important diagnostic modalities for Helicobacter pylori, now and in the future.1997
- Accuracy of invasive and noninvasive tests to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infectionGastroenterology, 1995
- Isolation of Helicobacter pylori from human faecesThe Lancet, 1992
- Likelihood ratios with confidence: Sample size estimation for diagnostic test studiesPublished by Elsevier ,1991