PERIPARTUM HYSTERECTOMY - A REVIEW OF CESAREAN AND POSTPARTUM HYSTERECTOMY
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- review article
- Vol. 65 (3) , 365-370
Abstract
A retrospective review of 117 women who underwent peripartum hysterectomy at Duke University Medical Center [Darham, North Carolina, USA] during the past 21 years was conducted. Seventy-three cesarean hysterectomies were performed electively; 44 cesarean or postpartum hysterectomies were performed as emergencies. Statistically significant differences were noted between these groups in surgical technique, operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative hypotension and intraoperative and total blood replacement. Additional significant differences were noted in postoperative febrile morbidity, use of therapeutic antibiotics, incidence of thromboembolic phenomena, and length of postoperative hospital stay. Separate analysis of elective cesarean hysterectomy patients revealed statistically significant decreases in operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative and total blood replacement and postoperative hospital stay in the group having an experienced surgeon when compared with the group with less experienced surgeons.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- EMERGENCY HYSTERECTOMY FOR OBSTETRIC HEMORRHAGE1984
- HYSTERECTOMY AT THE TIME OF CESAREAN-SECTION - ANALYSIS OF 108 CASES1981
- Cesarean hysterectomy: A twenty-five–year reviewAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1979