Information Retrieval as Counterfactual

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Relevance, one of the fundamental notions in information retrieval (IR), has long been studied from a cognitive point of view. It is known that relevance depends not only on the topic of the document and the information need expressed in a query, but also on other ‘situational’ factors in the retrieval situation, such as the user's previous knowledge, background, intentions and so on. Formal models, on the other hand, usually consider relevance from a system point of view, i.e. they isolate relevance in a restricted context in which only the topic matters. One of the reasons for this very partial modeling is due to the inappropriateness of standard formal tools for describing relevance in a general context. This paper is an attempt to identify of more appropriate logical framework for the modeling. Counterfactual conditional logic is examined with respect to the IR requirements, indicating the logic's high potential value for this task. A particular conditional logic is then defined which, in comparison with previous developments on conditional logic, is better suited to IR. The new model gives an insight into the phenomena related to the ‘situational’ factors of relevance judgment which, until now, have not been considered.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: