Chemotherapy of small-cell carcinoma of lung: a randomized comparison of alternating and sequential combination chemotherapy programs.
- 1 November 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 2 (11) , 1192-1199
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1984.2.11.1192
Abstract
Patients (147) with small-cell carcinoma of the lung (SCCL) were randomized to receive alternating (A) or sequential (S) combination chemotherapy. Initial treatment was with 3 cycles of VAM(A) or 2 cycles of POCC(S). VAM consists of VP16-213 [etoposide] 200 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, Adriamycin 50 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, and methotrexate 30 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 repeated at 21-day intervals. POCC consists of cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8, vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 (maximum, 2 mg) i.v. days 1 and 8, CCNU [carmustine] 60 mg/m2 p.o. [per os] day 1, and procarbazine 100 mg/m2 p.o. days 2 through 15. After initial treatment, all patients received whole brain radiation therapy (3000 rad/10 fractions per 2 wk). Patients with limited disease in addition received irradiation encompassing the tumor, hilar, mediastinal and supraclavicular regions (5000 rad/25 fractions per 5 wk). After radiation, patients on arm A received POCC alternating with VAM; patients on arm S received POCC until progression when they were to be treated with VAM. The alternating arm was superior with respect to rate of complete remission (CR), median disease-free survival (MDFS), and median survival (MS). The advantage of alternating therapy was not as clearly demonstrated in the limited disease groups when interposition of involved field radiation delayed the initiation of the alternating schedule. In limited disease alone, comparing arm A with arm S, no statistically significant differences were noted. The CR rate was 42% vs. 54%, MDFS was 14 vs. 10 mo., and MS was 16 vs. 10 mo. In extensive disease, the CR rate was 44% vs. 20% (P = 0.03), MDFS was 6 vs. 4 mo. (P = 0.003), and MS was 10 vs. 7 mo. (P = 0.001). Improved treatment outcome in SCCL is achieved when combination chemotherapy regimens of similar effectiveness are administered in an alternating rather than sequential schedule.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prophylactic irradiation in bronchogenic small cell anaplastic carcinoma. A comparative trial of localized versus extensive radiotherapy including prophylactic brain irradiation in patients receiving combination chemotherapyCancer, 1980
- CLONAL HETEROGENEITY OF SMALL-CELL ANAPLASTIC CARCINOMA OF THE LUNG DEMONSTRATED BY FLOW-CYTOMETRIC DNA ANALYSIS1980
- The superiority of combination chemotherapy over single agent chemotherapy in small cell lung carcinomaCancer, 1979
- MATHEMATIC MODEL FOR RELATING THE DRUG SENSITIVITY OF TUMORS TO THEIR SPONTANEOUS MUTATION-RATE1979
- CYCLIC ALTERNATING COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR SMALL CELL BRONCHOGENIC CARCINOMA1979
- The effectiveness of prophylactic brain irradiation in small cell carcinoma of the lung. A Southwest Oncology Group StudyCancer, 1978
- Small-Cell Carcinoma of the Lung: Combined Chemotherapy and RadiationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1978
- ROLE OF RADIATION-THERAPY IN COMBINATION WITH CHEMOTHERAPY IN EXTENSIVE OAT CELL-CANCER OF LUNG - RANDOMIZED STUDY1977
- COMBINED MODALITY TREATMENT FOR OAT CELL-CARCINOMA OF LUNG - RANDOMIZED TRIAL1977
- INTENSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY OF SMALL CELL BRONCHOGENIC CARCINOMA1977