Reaction Time to a Second Stimulus as a Function of Intensity of the First Stimulus
- 1 May 1967
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 19 (2) , 125-132
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14640746708400081
Abstract
Reaction time (RT) to the second of two stimuli presented in rapid succession was examined as a function of the intensity of the first stimulus (S1). It was found that the delay in RT2 was greater following a dim first stimulus than following a bright first stimulus. The magnitude of this increase corresponded to the difference in RTs to the two intensity levels of S1. These results support the prediction of a single channel model of response selection. Examination of mean first RTs revealed a general elevation in latency of RT. However, since this increase was not influenced by the inter-stimulus interval (ISI) or by the intensity of the second stimulus (S2), and since the same increase was found on “catch trials“ where no S2 was presented, this increase is considered to be a function of change in set in the double response situation.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Time and event uncertainty in unisensory reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966
- Reaction time to single and to first signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963
- The Human Operator as a Single Channel Information SystemThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957
- La période réfractaire psychologiqueL’Année psychologique, 1957
- The Limits of the “Psychological Refractory Period”The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1956
- Central Inhibition—Some Refractory ObservationsQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955
- MECHANISM OF SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENTSArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1954
- The Discontinuous Functioning of the Human Operator in Pursuit TasksQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1948
- The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1931