On the Predominant Electron-Donicity of Polar Solid Surfaces
- 1 June 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Adhesion
- Vol. 63 (1) , 71-88
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00218469708015214
Abstract
The reasons for the predominant electron-donicity of almost all solid polar surfaces and its implications are discussed in this paper. By contact angle or interfacial tension measurements, the electron-accepting as well as the electron-donating properties of polar liquids can be ascertained, through the interplay between their energies of adhesion and cohesion. For the solid-liquid interface, direct interfacial tension measurements are not possible, but indirectly, solid/liquid interfacial tensions of polar systems can be obtained by contact angle measurement. However, as the energy of cohesion of a solid does not influence the contact angle formed by a liquid drop placed upon its surface, one can only measure the solid surface'ks residual polar property, manifested by the energy of adhesion between solid and liquid. This residual polar property is of necessity the dominant component; in most cases this turns out to be its electron donicity. When, by means of contact angle measurements with polar liquids, both electron-accepting and electron-donating potentials are found on a polar solid, it is most likely still partly covered with a polar liquid: usually water. The amount of residual water of hydration of a polar solid follows from its polar (Lewis acid-base) surface tension component (γAB). The degree of orientation of the residual water of hydration on a polar solid can be expressed by the ratio of the electron-donating to electron-accepting potentials (γ⊖/γ⊕), measured on the hydrated surface.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Hydrophilicity and Hydrophobicity of Clay MineralsClays and Clay Minerals, 1995
- Evaluation of the Lifshitz-van der Waals/Acid-Base Approach To Determine Surface Tension ComponentsLangmuir, 1995
- Comments on "Does the phase rule for capillary systems really justify an equation of state for interfacial tensions?"Langmuir, 1993
- Determination of contact angles and pore sizes of porous media by column and thin layer wickingJournal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 1992
- DLVO and Non-DLVO Interactions in HectoriteClays and Clay Minerals, 1990
- ESTIMATION OF THE POLAR SURFACE TENSION PARAMETERS OF GLYCEROL AND FORMAMIDE, FOR USE IN CONTACT ANGLE MEASUREMENTS ON POLAR SOLIDSJournal of Dispersion Science and Technology, 1990
- The Mechanism of Phase Separation of Polymers in Organic Media—Apolar and Polar SystemsSeparation Science and Technology, 1989
- Additive and nonadditive surface tension components and the interpretation of contact anglesLangmuir, 1988
- Orientation of the water molecules of hydration of human serum albuminProtein Journal, 1988
- Acid-base behavior of carboxylic acid groups covalently attached at the surface of polyethylene: The usefulness of contact angle in following the ionization of surface functionalityLangmuir, 1985