Ecosystem management: The U.S. forest service's response to social conflict
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Society & Natural Resources
- Vol. 8 (2) , 161-168
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929509380909
Abstract
The U.S. Forest Service has adopted ecosystem management, a concept mired in conceptual imprecision, as its new management direction. This article first argues that the agency's adoption of ecosystem management as a policy direction is an attempt by the agency to resolve a state of perpetual conflict that has resulted from its historical emphasis on timber production and neglect of issues relevant to a constituency not oriented to commodity production. Several propositions drawn from conflict theory illustrate the nature of this conflict between the agency and its constituencies. Second, this article contends that the agency's inability to respond to its changing constituencies is due in part to the formal educational process that emphasized the technical aspects of forestry management while neglecting issues of social choice.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- From New Perspectives to Ecosystem Management: Response to Frissell et al. and Lawrence and MurphyConservation Biology, 1992
- Multiresource Forest Management: A Paradigmatic Challenge to Professional ForestryJournal of Forestry, 1990
- Measuring Forest Service BiasJournal of Forestry, 1989
- Multiple Use vs. Organizational CommitmentForest Science, 1988
- Legislative Confrontation of Groupthink in US Natural Resource AgenciesEnvironmental Conservation, 1988
- Conceiving forest management as providing for current and future social valueForest Ecology and Management, 1985
- The Strategy of Ecosystem DevelopmentScience, 1969
- The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and TermsEcology, 1935