Centrosomal aberrations in primary invasive breast cancer are associated with nodal status and hormone receptor expression
Open Access
- 21 August 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 107 (3) , 346-352
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.11408
Abstract
Our purpose was to assess the presence of centrosomal aberrations as measured by immunohistochemistry in primary invasive breast cancer and their association with established and proposed prognostic factors. Tissue sections of 103 primary invasive breast cancers were examined using centrosome‐specific antibodies to pericentrin and γ‐tubulin. At least 3 different tumor regions per case were examined to determine maximum centrosomal aberration levels, which represent the proportion of cells with abnormal centrosomes in the region with the highest percentage of cells with centrosomal aberrations. The χ2 test was performed to evaluate the association of maximum centrosomal aberration levels with patient age; tumor size; nodal status; nuclear grade; hormone receptor and Her2/neu expression; proportion of Ki67‐, p53‐ and Bcl‐2‐positive tumor cells; DNA index; S‐phase fraction; and proliferation index. With pericentrin immunohistochemistry, maximum centrosomal aberration levels >35% were detectable in 92 of the 103 breast carcinomas (89%). We found a highly significant correlation of maximum centrosomal aberration levels above 35% with axillary nodal tumor involvement (p < 0.0001) and the absence of hormone receptors (p < 0.0001). In addition, there was a borderline significant relationship with age 35% were also associated with an increased DNA index (p = 0.006). In a subset of patients, additional staining of centrosomes with a monoclonal anti‐γ‐tubulin antibody essentially confirmed these results. In primary invasive breast cancer, centrosomal aberrations are associated with those factors predicting a more aggressive course of disease. This might indicate a fundamental role of centrosomal dysfunction in disease evolution, possibly as a result of chromosome missegregation during mitosis.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Synergistic induction of centrosome hyperamplification by loss of p53 and cyclin E overexpressionOncogene, 2000
- Centrosome Amplification and a Defective G2–M Cell Cycle Checkpoint Induce Genetic Instability in BRCA1 Exon 11 Isoform–Deficient CellsMolecular Cell, 1999
- Genetic Aberrations in Hypodiploid Breast Cancer: Frequent Loss of Chromosome 4 and Amplification of Cyclin D1 OncogeneThe American Journal of Pathology, 1998
- The Long and Short of Chromosome 11 in Breast CancerThe American Journal of Pathology, 1998
- Somatic genetic changes in human breast cancerBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer, 1994
- One or multiple samplings for flow cytometric DNA analyses in breast cancer‐prognostic implications?Cytometry, 1992
- Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapyThe Lancet, 1992
- Prediction of Relapse or Survival in Patients with Node-Negative Breast Cancer by DNA Flow CytometryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- DNA index and cell cycle analysis of primary breast cancer and synchronous axillary lymph node metastasesBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1989
- Microtubule Organizing CentersAnnual Review of Cell Biology, 1985