Numerical solutions for unsteady flow in unconfined aquifers
- 1 November 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
- Vol. 15 (11) , 1643-1657
- https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620151107
Abstract
Two numerical methods for solving the problem of unsteady flow in unconfined aquifers are studied. They are an explicit finite difference method (FDM), and the finite element method (FEM). The FEM is further subdivided into three schemes: vertical displacement approach, explicit scheme (FEM1), normal velocity approach, explicit scheme (FEM2), and vertical displacement approach, implicit scheme (FEM3). Results from the above methods are compared with experimental results from a sand box model. Various factors affecting the accuracy and numerical stability are investigated. Results indicate that, for a similar degree of accuracy, the FEM requires less computational effort than the explicit FDM. Amongst the three FEM schemes, FEM3 appears to be most attractive as it is the most stable and economical of the three schemes compared.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prediction of mound geometry under recharge basinsWater Resources Research, 1976
- DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF AQUIFER SYSTEMS TO LOCALIZED RECHARGE1Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1976
- Ground-Water Recharge SimulationJournal of the Hydraulics Division, 1975
- On the solution of transient free-surface flow problems in porous media by the finite element methodJournal of Hydrology, 1973
- Groundwater flow in a sandy tidal beach: 2. Two‐dimensional finite element analysisWater Resources Research, 1972
- On the solution of transient free-surface flow problems in porous media by finite-difference methodsJournal of Hydrology, 1971
- Variational Principles for Confined and Unconfined Flow of Ground WaterWater Resources Research, 1970