Phase II trial of chemoembolization for the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the liver and review of the literature
- 1 April 1998
- Vol. 82 (7) , 1250-1259
- https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980401)82:7<1250::aid-cncr7>3.0.co;2-j
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatic artery chemoembolization represents an alternative treatment for patients whose neoplastic lesions are not amenable or have become refractory to other treatment modalities. This project was designed to test the feasibility of regional chemoembolization for patients with colorectal carcinoma metastasis to the liver who had experienced failure with one or more systemic treatments. METHODS Thirty patients who met the study entry criteria underwent one to three hepatic artery chemoembolizations. The chemoembolization regimen consisted of an injection of a bovine collagen material with cisplatin (10 mg/mL), doxorubicin (3 mg/mL), and mitomycin C (3 mg/mL). Repeat treatments were performed at 6‐ to 8‐week intervals. RESULTS Radiologic responses, as measured by a decrease in lesion density of at least 75% of the lesion or a 25% decrease in the size of the lesion, occurred in 63% of the cases. A decrease of at least 25% of the baseline carcinoembryonic antigen level occurred in 95% of the cases. All responses were transient. Median survival for all 30 patients was 8.6 months after the initiation of chemoembolization and 29 months after the initial diagnosis of metastasis to the liver. Common toxicities included a "postembolization syndrome," which consisted of fever > 101 °F (83%), pain in the right upper quadrant (100%), nausea, and vomiting. Lethargy was a common occurrence (in 60+% of cases) and lasted up to 6 weeks. Hematologic toxicities included leukocytosis, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS Chemoembolization is a feasible treatment modality for patients with colorectal carcinoma metastasis to the liver who have experienced failure with other systemic treatments. It results in high response rates with transient mild‐to‐moderate toxicity. Responses are measured in months, however, and all patients have eventual progression of disease. Patients who are able to undergo three or more chemoembolization procedures may receive the most clinical benefit. Cancer 1998;82:1250‐9. © 1998 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase III Study of Bolus Versus Infusion Fluorouracil With or Without Cisplatin in Advanced Colorectal CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1996
- Quality of life and survival with continuous hepatic-artery floxuridine infusion for colorectal liver metastasesThe Lancet, 1994
- A prospective, randomized evaluation of the treatment of colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1990
- Hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma: Impact of surgical resection on the natural historyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1990
- Intra-arterial Floxuridine vs Systemic Fluorouracil for Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal CancerArchives of Surgery, 1990
- Regional treatment of hepatic metastases and hepatocellular carcinomaCurrent Problems in Cancer, 1989
- A Prospective Randomized Trial of Regional Versus Systemic Continuous 5-Fluorodeoxyuridine Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Colorectal Liver MetastasesAnnals of Surgery, 1987
- Intrahepatic or Systemic Infusion of Fluorodeoxyuridine in Patients with Liver Metastases from Colorectal CarcinomaAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1987
- Hepatic Resection of Coiorectal MetastasesAnnals of Surgery, 1985
- Major Hepatic Resection for Metachronous Metastases from Colon CancerAnnals of Surgery, 1985