Fluorescence In situ Hybridization Subgroup Analysis of TRIBUTE, a Phase III Trial of Erlotinib Plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Open Access
- 30 September 2008
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 14 (19) , 6317-6323
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-0539
Abstract
Purpose: TRIBUTE was a phase III trial evaluating the addition of erlotinib to carboplatin and paclitaxel as a first-line treatment for advanced non–small cell lung cancer that did not meet its primary end point of improving overall survival. Here, we assess the value of using epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number in tumor biopsy samples, as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), as a predictor of treatment outcome. Methods: EGFR FISH analysis was done using LSI EGFR SpectrumOrange/CEP7 SpectrumGreen probe. Results: Of 275 samples, 245 (89.1%) were successfully analyzed by FISH. One hundred (40.8%) of patients were EGFR FISH(+). Median overall survival was not different between FISH(+) and FISH(−) patients in either the chemotherapy+erlotinib arm or the chemotherapy+placebo arm. In FISH(+) patients, median time to progression (TTP) was 6.3 months in the erlotinib arm versus 5.8 months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.99; P = 0.0430); in FISH(−) patients, median TTP was 4.6 months versus 6.0 months (hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-2.14; P = 0.0895; treatment interaction test, P = 0.007). After 6 months of treatment, a notable separation of the TTP curves in favor of erlotinib emerged. Objective response rates were 11.6% versus 29.8% in FISH(+) patients (chemotherapy+erlotinib arm versus chemotherapy+placebo arm; P = 0.0495) and 21.8% versus 25.4%, respectively, for FISH(−) patients (P = 0.6954). Conclusions: EGFR gene copy number by FISH did not predict survival benefit. However, among EGFR FISH(+) patients, TTP was longer in patients who received erlotinib and continued to receive it after completing first-line therapy.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase III Study of Erlotinib in Combination With Cisplatin and Gemcitabine in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Tarceva Lung Cancer Investigation TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number and protein level are not associated with outcome of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapyAnnals of Oncology, 2006
- Molecular Predictors of Outcome With Gefitinib in a Phase III Placebo-Controlled Study in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Biological Markers for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patient Selection for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor TherapyClinical Cancer Research, 2006
- Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Messenger RNA Expression, Gene Dosage, and Gefitinib Sensitivity in Non–Small Cell Lung CancerClinical Cancer Research, 2006
- Smoking History and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression as Predictors of Survival Benefit from Erlotinib for Patients with Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study BR.21Clinical Lung Cancer, 2006
- Pharmacodynamic Separation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Chemotherapy in Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerClinical Lung Cancer, 2006
- Efficacy of Gefitinib, an Inhibitor of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase, in Symptomatic Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung CancerJAMA, 2003
- Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Non–Small-Cell Lung Carcinomas: Correlation Between Gene Copy Number and Protein Expression and Impact on PrognosisJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Multi-Institutional Randomized Phase II Trial of Gefitinib for Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003