SCIENTIFIC FRAUD AND THE POWER STRUCTURE OF SCIENCE
Open Access
- 1 June 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Pluto Journals in Prometheus
- Vol. 10 (1) , 83-98
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08109029208629515
Abstract
In the routine practice of scientific research, there are many types of misrepresentation and bias which could be considered dubious. However, only a few narrowly defined behaviours are singled out and castigated as scientific fraud. A narrow definition of scientific fraud is convenient to the groups in society – scientific elites, and powerful government and corporate interests – that have the dominant influence on priorities in science. Several prominent Australian cases illustrate how the denunciation of fraud helps to paint the rest of scientific behaviour as blameless.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Problems of citation analysis: A critical reviewJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1989
- The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific MethodPublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- Scientific Establishments and HierarchiesPublished by Springer Nature ,1982
- Creative Penmanship in Animal Testing Prompts FDA ControlsScience, 1977
- Triviality in Science: A Brief Meditation on FashionsPerspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1976