Rate vs Rhythm Control in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
- 14 February 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 165 (3) , 258-262
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.165.3.258
Abstract
Review from JAMA Internal Medicine — Rate vs Rhythm Control in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation — A Meta-analysisThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetesThe Lancet, 2004
- Active-control clinical trials to establish equivalence or noninferiority: methodological and statistical concepts linked to qualityAmerican Heart Journal, 2003
- Asymptomatic or “silent” atrial fibrillation. frequency in untreated patients and patients receiving azimilideACC Current Journal Review, 2003
- Risks and benefits of rate control versus maintenance of sinus rhythmThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2003
- A Comparison of Rate Control and Rhythm Control in Patients with Recurrent Persistent Atrial FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- A Comparison of Rate Control and Rhythm Control in Patients with Atrial FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Rate-control versus conversion strategy in postoperative atrial fibrillation: A prospective, randomized pilot studyAmerican Heart Journal, 2000
- Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation—Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF): a randomised trialPublished by Elsevier ,2000
- The incidence of asymptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients treated with propranolol or propafenoneInternational Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995