Relative Comprehensibility of Pictorial Information and Printed Words in Proceduralized Instructions
- 1 June 1975
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Vol. 17 (3) , 266-277
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872087501700306
Abstract
A study was conducted to compare the relative comprehensibility of pictorial information and printed words in instructions. Six picture-word formats were examined using 24 procedural problems on three types of tasks. The formats were print-only, pictorial-only, pictorial-related print, print-related pictorial, pictorial-redundant print, and print-redundant pictorial. The results showed pictorial information important for speed but print information necessary for accuracy. Comprehension of instructions on all three tasks was most efficient with the pictorial-related print and pictorial-redundant print formats but could not be shown to be simply a function of number of visual information channels used or the degree of redundancy between channels. The type of information displayed in the visual channels was found to be important.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- How we Remember what we seeScientific American, 1970
- On the locus of picture-word differences in paired-associate learningJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970
- “Words, Words, Words”Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1965
- Why is a picture worth a thousand words?Audiovisual communication review, 1963
- Single and multiple channel communication: A review of research and a proposed modelAudiovisual communication review, 1961