Should Generational Accounts Replace Public Budgets and Deficits?
- 1 February 1994
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Vol. 8 (1) , 95-111
- https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.95
Abstract
The author assesses the concept of ‘generational accounts’ and the specific accounts constructed by Alan Auerbach, Jagadeesh Gokhale, and Laurence Kotlikoff (1991). Although these accounts support the assertion of present-orientation in fiscal policy, they rest on numerous assumptions based on judgments that are open to question. These involve the treatment of the public budget constraint, the benefits from public exhaustive expenditures, economic and population projections, the discount rate, and fiscal incidence. Alternative and equally reasonable assumptions could yield radically different conclusions. The author concludes that the Auerbach, Gokhale, and Kotlikoff accounts should not replace the annual public budget, as they argue.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Budget Deficits: Rhetoric and RealityJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1989
- A TEST OF STEADY‐STATE GOVERNMENT‐DEBT NEUTRALITYEconomic Inquiry, 1989
- Interest Rates and Expected Future Budget Deficits in the United StatesJournal of Political Economy, 1987
- New Evidence on Deficits and Interest RatesJournal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1986
- The Asset Price Approach to the Analysis of Capital Income TaxationPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- Social Security, Induced Retirement, and Aggregate Capital AccumulationJournal of Political Economy, 1974