Open versus Endovascular AAA Repair in Patients Who are Morphological Candidates for Endovascular Treatment
- 1 June 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Endovascular Therapy
- Vol. 9 (3) , 255-261
- https://doi.org/10.1177/152660280200900301
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the outcomes of open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a cohort of patients who fulfill morphological criteria for endovascular repair. Methods: A retrospective review of 229 consecutive AAA patients treated over a 3-year period identified 149 patients who were candidates for endovascular repair based on preoperative computed tomography and angiography. Of the 149 patients, 79 (68 men; mean age 74 ± 8 years) underwent endovascular repair with the AneuRx stent-graft; the remaining 70 (56 men; mean age 72 ± 8 years) had open repair. Short-term outcome measures were 30-day mortality and procedure-related morbidity, length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital, intraoperative blood loss, interval to oral diet, and time to ambulation. Long-term outcome measures included death and secondary procedures. Results: There was no difference in the 30-day mortality between endovascular repair (2, 2.5%) and open repair (2, 2.9%), even though endovascular patients had more comorbidities (p<0.05). Overall length of stay was reduced for endovascular patients (3.9 ± 2.4 days versus 7.7 ± 3.1 days for surgical patients, p<0.0001). Fewer endograft patients had complications (24% versus 40% for open repair, p<0.05), and the severity of these complications was less, as evidenced by the shorter hospital stays for endovascular patients with complications compared to conventionally treated patients with complications (6.7 ± 2.4 days versus 22.5 ± 35.2 days, p<0.05). There were no aneurysm ruptures or late surgical conversions in either group. Conclusions: Patients with AAA who were endograft candidates but who were treated with open repair experienced more morbidity and had more complications than patients treated with stent-grafts. Despite increased comorbidities in the endograft patients, there was no increase in mortality compared to open repair. Both treatments required secondary procedures and appeared to be equally effective in preventing aneurysm rupture up to 3 years.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Endoleak as a predictor of outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx multicenter clinical trialJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2000
- Abdominal Aortic AneurysmAnnals of Surgery, 1999
- Mid-term results of a second generation bifurcated endovascular graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: The French Vanguard trialJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1999
- Realistic Expectations for Patients with Stent-graft Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Results of a European Multicentre RegistryEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 1999
- AneuRx stent graft versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Multicenter prospective clinical trialJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1999
- Endoluminal Stent–Grafts for Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic AneurysmsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- The impact of selective use of dipyridamole-thallium scans and surgical factors on the current morbidity of aortic surgeryJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1992
- Survival in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Comparison between operative and nonoperative managementEuropean Journal of Vascular Surgery, 1990
- Prognosis of Abdominal Aortic AneurysmsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Multicenter prospective study of nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Part II. Variables predicting morbidity and mortalityJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1989