EFFECTS OF NONCONTINGENT REINFORCEMENT ON PROBLEM BEHAVIOR AND STIMULUS ENGAGEMENT: THE ROLE OF SATIATION, EXTINCTION, AND ALTERNATIVE REINFORCEMENT
- 1 December 2000
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Vol. 33 (4) , 433-449
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2000.33-433
Abstract
This study examined the effects of noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) with and without extinction on problem behavior and stimulus engagement (consumption of reinforcement) of 4 participants. Reductions in problem behavior using NCR have frequently been attributed to both satiation of the reinforcer and extinction. In the current study, aspects of the NCR treatment effects were difficult to explain based solely on either a satiation or an extinction account. Specifically, it was found that stimulus engagement remained high throughout the NCR treatment analysis, and that problem behavior was reduced to near-zero levels during NCR without extinction. The implications of these findings are discussed with respect to the satiation and extinction hypotheses frequently described in the applied literature. Findings from basic studies examining the effects of response-independent schedules are presented, and are used as the basis for a matching theory account of NCR-related effects. It is proposed that reductions in problem behavior observed during NCR interventions may be a function of the availability of alternative sources of reinforcement.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- RELATIVE VERSUS ABSOLUTE REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTSJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1999
- NONCONTINGENT PRESENTATION OF ATTENTION AND ALTERNATIVE STIMULI IN THE TREATMENT OF ATTENTION‐MAINTAINED DESTRUCTIVE BEHAVIORJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1997
- NEGATIVE SIDE EFFECTS OF NONCONTINGENT REINFORCEMENTJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1997
- NONCONTINGENT REINFORCEMENT AS TREATMENT FOR SEVERE PROBLEM BEHAVIOR: SOME PROCEDURAL VARIATIONSJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1997
- COMBINING NONCONTINGENT REINFORCEMENT AND DIFFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES AS TREATMENT FOR ABERRANT BEHAVIORJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1996
- NONCONTINGENT ESCAPE AS TREATMENT FOR SELF‐INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR MAINTAINED BY NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENTJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1995
- LINKING DESCRIPTIVE AND EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSES IN THE TREATMENT OF BIZARRE SPEECHJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1991
- SUPERIMPOSITION OF RESPONSE‐INDEPENDENT REINFORCEMENTJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1986
- The importance of Herrnstein's mathematical statement of the law of effect for behavior therapy.American Psychologist, 1982
- The importance of Herrnstein's mathematical statement of the law of effect for behavior therapy.American Psychologist, 1982