IS OBSTETRICS SAFE IN SMALL HOSPITALS?: Evidence from New Zealand's Regionalised Perinatal System
- 24 August 1985
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 326 (8452) , 429-432
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92747-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of low‐risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared‐care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. I. Obstetrical procedures and neonatal outcomeBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1983
- Assessing the Effectiveness of Neonatal Intensive CareMedical Care, 1982
- Perinatal referral: a time for decisions.BMJ, 1982
- Do general practitioner deliveries constitute a perinatal mortality risk?BMJ, 1982
- Identifying the Sources of the Recent Decline in Perinatal Mortality Rates in CaliforniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- The Numbers Game, or Is Small Beautiful?New England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Analysis of interrupted time series mortality trends: an example to evaluate regionalized perinatal care.American Journal of Public Health, 1981
- Neonatal mortality: an analysis of the recent improvement in the United States.American Journal of Public Health, 1980
- Regionalization of OperationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Regional Variations in Perinatal Mortality in New Zealand and their SignificanceAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1969