New systemic frontline treatment for metastatic colorectal carcinoma
Open Access
- 18 March 2004
- Vol. 100 (8) , 1558-1577
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20154
Abstract
Options for first‐line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma have broadened considerably with the introduction of irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Furthermore, the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine has demonstrated efficacy in Phase III trials and recently was approved for first‐line treatment in Europe and the United States. Capecitabine yielded similar median times to disease progression and median survival rates compared with bolus 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU)/leucovorin (LV) (Mayo Clinic/North Central Cancer Treatment Group regimen), with superior and similar response rates, respectively. However, its role as a first‐line, single‐agent substitute for intermittent infusional 5‐FU/LV remains to be defined. The addition of irinotecan or oxaliplatin to 5‐FU/LV resulted in improved response rates and progression‐free survival in large, randomized trials; moreover, irinotecan‐containing regimens resulted in improved overall survival. Prevalent regimens of irinotecan/5‐FU/LV and oxaliplatin/5‐FU/LV have been compared in two randomized Phase III trials. One study demonstrated the statistical superiority of oxaliplatin/infusional 5‐FU/LV over irinotecan/bolus 5‐FU/LV in terms of response, time to disease progression, and median survival; however, those advantages may have been attributable to infusional administration or to major differences in second‐line therapy. A randomized Phase III study comparing irinotecan and oxaliplatin in combination with the same infusional 5‐FU/LV regimens and crossover in case of disease progression showed equivalent efficacy for both schedules in the first‐line setting, but the irinotecan combination proved beneficial in terms of safety. New molecular targeted agents, such as angiogenesis‐modulating compounds (e.g., bevacizumab) and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (e.g., cetuximab), are under clinical investigation. This review updates current systemic frontline treatments and future perspectives for patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 97 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase III Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin Versus Vindesine Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Japanese Taxotere Lung Cancer Study GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: PTK787/ZK 222584Seminars in Oncology, 2003
- Development of The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Tarcevatm(Osi-774)Published by Springer Nature ,2003
- First-line oral capecitabine therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a favorable safety profile compared with intravenous5-fluorouracil/leucovorinAnnals of Oncology, 2002
- Capecitabine as first-line treatment in colorectal cancerEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2002
- Activity and safety of capecitabine and irinotecan (CPT-11) in association as first line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC)European Journal Of Cancer, 2001
- Efficacy of intravenous continuous infusion of fluorouracil compared with bolus administration in advanced colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis Group In Cancer.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- Randomized trial comparing monthly low-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus with bimonthly high-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus plus continuous infusion for advanced colorectal cancer: a French intergroup study.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997
- Final results of a randomised trial comparing ‘Tomudex’® (raltitrexed) with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancerAnnals of Oncology, 1996
- Modulation of fluorouracil by leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: evidence in terms of response rate. Advanced Colorectal Cancer Meta-Analysis Project.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1992